This is the total number of repair jobs the council finished in the year. On its own it is a measure of activity and landlord size rather than quality. It matters mostly in comparison with the number of repairs reported: if completions keep pace with reports, tenants get their repairs done; if they fall short, a backlog builds up.
| name | tsm_repairs_completed |
|---|---|
| dataset | 10-tenant-satisfaction-measures |
| kind | extracted |
| type | count |
| unit | count |
| grain | landlord-year |
| role | feature |
| source | `data/TSM_2025_Full_Data/TSM_2025_Full_Data - File 04 - Management_info.csv`, column `Repairs Calculated Value` |
| period | 2024/25 (year to 31 March 2025) |
| missingness | Stock-transfer (LSVT) councils are absent — they own no stock, so absence is structural, not missing data. Only large landlords (1,000+ social homes) report; Files 05/06 list excluded landlords. CH01/CH02 also have `_LCHO`/`_COMB` variants in File 04 — landlords reporting combined tenures carry values in the `_COMB` columns, so check variants before treating a value as missing. |
| score_note | Raw volume; scale-dominated, superseded by repairs-per-home and backlog ratio. |
| peer_group | registered landlords (RSH-regulated, 1,000+ homes) — not yet scored on the leaderboard |
Number of responsive repairs completed during the year (File 04). A raw volume figure — scale-dependent, so use per-home or against repairs raised (see constructed variables) for comparison.