This is roughly what the council spends each year on bin collections, divided by the number of households it serves — the yearly cost of emptying one home's bins. It matters because collection is a service every household receives, so it is one of the fairest ways to compare councils' waste spending. A low figure suggests efficient collection rounds; a high one can mean expensive contracts, sparse rural rounds, or more generous services (like weekly rather than fortnightly pickups).
| Council | Class | Value | In its class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kingston Upon Thames | london | 864.09 | 1st worst of 33 |
| Isles of Scilly | unitary | 426 | 1st worst of 60 |
| City of London | london | 335 | 2nd worst of 33 |
| Milton Keynes UA | unitary | 146.5 | 2nd worst of 60 |
| Rochford | district | 140.67 | 1st worst of 160 |
| Oxford | district | 137.49 | 2nd worst of 160 |
| Tower Hamlets | london | 136.15 | 3rd worst of 33 |
| West Devon | district | 133.14 | 3rd worst of 160 |
| Bexley | london | 132.16 | 4th worst of 33 |
| Gloucester | district | 129.26 | 4th worst of 160 |
| Council | Class | Value | In its class |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Holland | district | -22.46 | 1st best of 160 |
| Watford | district | -0.69 | 2nd best of 160 |
| Colchester | district | 0 | 3rd best of 160 |
| Stockport MBC | metropolitan | 1.37 | 1st best of 36 |
| Hart DC | district | 2.03 | 4th best of 160 |
| Richmond upon Thames | london | 7.39 | 1st best of 33 |
| Harlow | district | 9.76 | 5th best of 160 |
| Rugby | district | 12.91 | 6th best of 160 |
| Wolverhampton | metropolitan | 14.93 | 2nd best of 36 |
| Tameside | metropolitan | 15.13 | 3rd best of 36 |
| name | collection_cost_per_household_gbp |
|---|---|
| dataset | 12-wastedataflow |
| kind | constructed |
| type | numeric |
| unit | GBP/household/year |
| grain | council-year |
| role | outcome |
| source | Formula: 1000 x Waste collection C7 (RO5, ../01-revenue-outturn/data/RO5_LA_Data_2024-25_data_by_LA.ods, joined on ONS Code) / Number of Households (raw CSV Q002, any 2024-25 quarter — prefilled and stable) |
| period | 2024-25 only |
| missingness | Comparable across collection and unitary authorities; not applicable to pure disposal authorities, which carry no collection spend. |
| score_note | Strong per-household cost signal but constructed from a 2024-25-only RO5 join. |
| calculated | ../calculated/collection-cost-per-household-gbp.csv |
| calculated_rows | 289 |
| calculated_periods | 2024-25 |
| calculated_date | 2026-08-13 |
| peer_group | districts (n=160), unitaries (n=60), metropolitan boroughs (n=36), London boroughs (n=33) — scored within each class against its median/IQR |
What bin collection costs each household served, net of income. It isolates the collection function, making it comparable across collection and unitary authorities regardless of disposal arrangements. Uses Defra-prefilled household counts from the quarterly returns as denominator.